↓ Skip to main content

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Semi‐mechanical versus Hand‐sewn or Circular Stapled Esophagogastrostomy for Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Semi‐mechanical versus Hand‐sewn or Circular Stapled Esophagogastrostomy for Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen‐Ping Wang, Qiang Gao, Kang‐Ning Wang, Hui Shi, Long‐Qi Chen

Abstract

Successful anastomosis is essential in esophagogastrectomy, and the application of the circular stapler effectively reduces the anastomotic leakage, although stricture formation has become more frequent. The present study, a randomized controlled trial, compared the recently developed semi-mechanical anastomosis with a hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy in prevention of anastomotic stricture.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Other 7 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,022
of 4,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,420
of 282,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.