| Title |
Low literacy and written drug information: information-seeking, leaflet evaluation and preferences, and roles for images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-016-0376-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mara M. van Beusekom, Petronella Grootens-Wiegers, Mark J. W. Bos, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Jos M. van den Broek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Librarian | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 72 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,521,329
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#617
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,874
of 333,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.