You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public support for policies to improve population and planetary health: A population-based online experiment assessing impact of communicating evidence of multiple versus single benefits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Science & Medicine, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleni Mantzari, James P. Reynolds, Susan A. Jebb, Gareth J. Hollands, Mark A. Pilling, Theresa M. Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 43% |
| Belgium | 3 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,383,224
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#2,607
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,840
of 515,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#50
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.