| Title |
Red and processed meat intake and risk of colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-012-0139-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dagfinn Aune, Doris S. M. Chan, Ana Rita Vieira, Deborah A. Navarro Rosenblatt, Rui Vieira, Darren C. Greenwood, Ellen Kampman, Teresa Norat |
| Abstract |
Current evidence indicates that red and processed meat intake increases the risk of colorectal cancer; however, the association with colorectal adenomas is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Turkey | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,102,928
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#96
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,353
of 297,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.