You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301748 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahid A Khan, Brian R Davidson, Robert D Goldin, Nigel Heaton, John Karani, Stephen P Pereira, William M C Rosenberg, Paul Tait, Simon D Taylor-Robinson, Andrew V Thillainayagam, Howard C Thomas, Harpreet Wasan |
| Abstract |
The British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of cholangiocarcinoma were originally published in 2002. This is the first update since then and is based on a comprehensive review of the recent literature, including data from randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cohort, prospective and retrospective studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 494 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 11% |
| Other | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 10% |
| Other | 108 | 21% |
| Unknown | 122 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 256 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Unknown | 144 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,117,457
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#1,260
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,344
of 188,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.