↓ Skip to main content

Toward Exercise as Personalized Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Toward Exercise as Personalized Medicine
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0018-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas W. Buford, Michael D. Roberts, Timothy S. Church

Abstract

The early 21st century has witnessed a steady push by scientists, industry leaders, and government officials to make medicine more personalized. To date, the concept of personalized medicine has referred largely to the field of pharmacogenomics. In contrast, relatively few data exist regarding the application of preventive strategies such as physical exercise in the context of personalized medicine. Within this review, we highlight the extant literature and propose five strategies for scientists that may propel the exercise and sports science fields toward this global goal. Notably, these approaches are in addition to methods to maintain adherence to training - a well-known factor in determining exercise responsiveness. Briefly, these strategies include (1) evaluating participant responses to training at the individual as well as group level; (2) identifying sources of variability in responsiveness to training; (3) optimizing exercise dosing strategies to maximize benefits while minimizing barriers to participation; (4) evaluating the efficacy of multimodal interventions for relevant population subgroups; and (5) increasing the clinical relevance of study populations and outcomes in exercise trials. We look forward to seeing these strategies considered in trials of preventive health interventions such as exercise. Extensive future research in this area is needed for the vision of exercise as a personalized form of medicine to become a reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 49 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 46 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,796,478
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,283
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,578
of 285,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.