You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shine a light on immobilized enzymes: real-time sensing in solid supported biocatalysts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan M. Bolivar, Tanja Consolati, Torsten Mayr, Bernd Nidetzky |
| Abstract |
Enzyme immobilization on solid supports has been key to biotransformation development. Although technologies for immobilization have largely reached maturity, the resulting biocatalysts are not well understood mechanistically. One limitation is that their internal environment is usually inferred from external data. Therefore, biological consequences of the immobilization remain masked by physical effects of mass transfer, obstructing further development. Work reviewed herein shows that opto-chemical sensing performed directly within the solid support enables the biocatalyst's internal environment to be uncovered quantitatively and in real time. Non-invasive methods of intraparticle pH and O2 determination are presented, and their use as process analytical tools for development of heterogeneous biocatalysts is described. Method diversification to other analytes remains a challenging task for the future. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Nepal | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 25% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#2,448
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,291
of 291,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.