You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Five Discrete Multinuclear Metal-Organic Assemblies from One Ligand: Deciphering the Effects of Different Templates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1021/ja311285b |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Imogen A. Riddell, Yana R. Hristova, Jack K. Clegg, Christopher S. Wood, Boris Breiner, Jonathan R. Nitschke |
| Abstract |
A rigid organic ligand, formed through the subcomponent self-assembly of p-toluidine and 6,6'-diformyl-3,3'-bipyridine, was employed in a systematic investigation into the synergistic and competing effects of metal and anion templation. A range of discrete and polymeric metal-organic complexes were formed, many of which represent structure types that have not previously been observed and whose formation would not be predicted on taking into account solely geometric considerations. These complex structures, capable of binding multiple guests within individual binding pockets, were characterized by NMR, ESI-MS, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The factors that stabilize individual complexes and lead to the formation of one over another are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 32% |
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 87 | 80% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,831,692
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#56,541
of 67,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,798
of 293,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#366
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.