↓ Skip to main content

The effect of damage and creep interaction on the behaviour of masonry columns including interface debonding and cracking

Overview of attention for article published in Materials and Structures, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The effect of damage and creep interaction on the behaviour of masonry columns including interface debonding and cracking
Published in
Materials and Structures, June 2011
DOI 10.1617/s11527-011-9745-6
Authors

Jung J. Kim, Tai Fan, Mahmoud M. Reda Taha, Nigel G. Shrive

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Materials and Structures
#237
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,490
of 111,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials and Structures
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.