Title |
Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-1680-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis Miller, Alfredo L. Milani, Suzette E. Sutherland, Bonnie Navin, Rebecca G. Rogers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#706
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,531
of 168,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#16
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.