You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Associations with Valvular Calcification and Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1109034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Thanassoulis, Catherine Y Campbell, David S Owens, J Gustav Smith, Albert V Smith, Gina M Peloso, Kathleen F Kerr, Sonali Pechlivanis, Matthew J Budoff, Tamara B Harris, Rajeev Malhotra, Kevin D O'Brien, Pia R Kamstrup, Børge G Nordestgaard, Anne Tybjaerg-Hansen, Matthew A Allison, Thor Aspelund, Michael H Criqui, Susan R Heckbert, Shih-Jen Hwang, Yongmei Liu, Marketa Sjogren, Jesper van der Pals, Hagen Kälsch, Thomas W Mühleisen, Markus M Nöthen, L Adrienne Cupples, Muriel Caslake, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, John Danesh, Jerome I Rotter, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Quenna Wong, Raimund Erbel, Sekar Kathiresan, Olle Melander, Vilmundur Gudnason, Christopher J O'Donnell, Wendy S Post |
| Abstract |
Limited information is available regarding genetic contributions to valvular calcification, which is an important precursor of clinical valve disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 23% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Panama | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 494 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 14% |
| Researcher | 70 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 10% |
| Other | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 9% |
| Other | 112 | 22% |
| Unknown | 110 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 232 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Unknown | 138 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 535. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#46,900
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,590
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230
of 297,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#13
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.