↓ Skip to main content

Redefining membership in animal groups

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Redefining membership in animal groups
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, April 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0090-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noam Miller, Robert Gerlai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 31%
Psychology 7 13%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,635
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,410
of 120,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.