| Title |
Guided review by frequent itemset mining: additional evidence for plaque detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11548-009-0290-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan C. Saur, Hatem Alkadhi, Lotus Desbiolles, Thomas J. Fuchs, Gábor Székely, Philippe C. Cattin |
| Abstract |
A guided review process to support manual coronary plaque detection in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) data sets is proposed. The method learns the spatial plaque distribution patterns by using the frequent itemset mining algorithm and uses this knowledge to predict potentially missed plaques during detection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 33% |
| Engineering | 3 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#497
of 841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,654
of 94,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.