↓ Skip to main content

The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers: Reliability in a Diverse Rural American Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers: Reliability in a Diverse Rural American Sample
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1779-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Scarpa, Nuri M. Reyes, Michelle A. Patriquin, Jill Lorenzi, Tyler A. Hassenfeldt, Varsha J. Desai, Kathryn W. Kerkering

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the modified checklist for autism in toddlers (M-CHAT) in a diverse rural American low-socioeconomic status (SES) sample. Four hundred and forty-seven English (n = 335) and Spanish (n = 112) speaking caregivers completed the M-CHAT during their toddler's 18- or 24-month well visit in a Southwest Virginia pediatric clinic. The M-CHAT did not show acceptable internal consistency in groups with low maternal education or minority status. Caregivers reporting low maternal education and minority status were more likely to endorse items suggestive of autism. These results indicate that the M-CHAT may require modifications to be more internally consistent and accurate across ethnic and educational groups in rural areas with low levels of SES. Recommendations to increase the utility of the M-CHAT are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,361,124
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,209
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,964
of 292,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#19
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.