↓ Skip to main content

What is the Conservation Value of a Plant in a Botanic Garden? Using Indicators to Improve Management of Ex Situ Collections

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
What is the Conservation Value of a Plant in a Botanic Garden? Using Indicators to Improve Management of Ex Situ Collections
Published in
The Botanical Review, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12229-013-9120-0
Authors

Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo, Abby Hird, Nora Oleas, Helen Ma, Alan W. Meerow, Javier Francisco-Ortega, M. Patrick Griffith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 48%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,148,784
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#57
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,528
of 200,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them