↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Corticosteroid Injection, Physiotherapy, or Both on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Unilateral Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
110 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Corticosteroid Injection, Physiotherapy, or Both on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Unilateral Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2013
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brooke K. Coombes, Leanne Bisset, Peter Brooks, Asad Khan, Bill Vicenzino

Abstract

Corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy, common treatments for lateral epicondylalgia, are frequently combined in clinical practice. However, evidence on their combined efficacy is lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 440 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 68 15%
Student > Master 57 13%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Postgraduate 46 10%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Other 92 20%
Unknown 96 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 185 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 17%
Sports and Recreations 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 117 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#316,616
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,898
of 36,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,243
of 293,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#18
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.