↓ Skip to main content

Far‐field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Far‐field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl070861
Authors

W. L. Yeck, M. Weingarten, H. M. Benz, D. E. McNamara, E. A. Bergman, R. B. Herrmann, J. L. Rubinstein, P. S. Earle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 57%
Engineering 9 11%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Energy 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#872,751
of 24,983,099 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,792
of 21,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,462
of 327,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#39
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,983,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.