You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Ramipril on Walking Times and Quality of Life Among Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2012.216237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna A. Ahimastos, Philip J. Walker, Christopher Askew, Anthony Leicht, Elise Pappas, Peter Blombery, Christopher M. Reid, Jonathan Golledge, Bronwyn A. Kingwell |
| Abstract |
Approximately one-third of patients with peripheral artery disease experience intermittent claudication, with consequent loss of quality of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#604,787
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6,143
of 36,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,565
of 292,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#34
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.