↓ Skip to main content

Use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer chemoprevention in 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer chemoprevention in 2010
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10549-012-2089-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika A. Waters, Timothy S. McNeel, Worta McCaskill Stevens, Andrew N. Freedman

Abstract

Two selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, have been shown in randomized clinical trials to reduce the risk of developing primary invasive breast cancer in high-risk women. In 1998, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) used these studies as a basis for approving tamoxifen for primary breast chemoprevention in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women at high risk. In 2007, the FDA approved raloxifene for primary breast cancer chemoprevention for postmenopausal women. Data from the year 2010 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of tamoxifen and raloxifene use for chemoprevention of primary breast cancers among U.S. women. Prevalence of use of chemopreventive agents for primary tumors was 20,598 (95 % CI, 518-114,864) for U.S. women aged 35-79 for tamoxifen. Prevalence was 96,890 (95 % CI, 41,277-192,391) for U.S. women aged 50-79 for raloxifene. Use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for prevention of primary breast cancers continues to be low. In 2010, women reporting medication use for breast cancer chemoprevention were primarily using the more recently FDA approved drug raloxifene. Multiple possible explanations for the low use exist, including lack of awareness and/or concern about side effects among primary care physicians and patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Chemistry 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,750,940
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#667
of 4,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,759
of 164,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.