You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risks of Colorectal and Other Cancers After Endometrial Cancer for Women With Lynch Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djs525 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aung Ko Win, Noralane M. Lindor, Ingrid Winship, Katherine M. Tucker, Daniel D. Buchanan, Joanne P. Young, Christophe Rosty, Barbara Leggett, Graham G. Giles, Jack Goldblatt, Finlay A. Macrae, Susan Parry, Matthew F. Kalady, John A. Baron, Dennis J. Ahnen, Loic Le Marchand, Steven Gallinger, Robert W. Haile, Polly A. Newcomb, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins |
| Abstract |
Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominantly inherited disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Previous studies have shown that MMR gene mutation carriers are at increased risk of colorectal, endometrial, and several other cancers following an initial diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We estimated cancer risks following an endometrial cancer diagnosis for women carrying MMR gene mutations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovakia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,317,232
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#846
of 7,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,658
of 204,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#12
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.