| Title |
Health and Environmental Risks from Lead-based Ammunition: Science Versus Socio-Politics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-016-1177-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon M. Arnemo, Oddgeir Andersen, Sigbjørn Stokke, Vernon G. Thomas, Oliver Krone, Deborah J. Pain, Rafael Mateo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Belarus | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 87% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#387,409
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#28
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,257
of 330,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.