| Title |
Electronic Health Record-Based Patient Identification and Individualized Mailed Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Cluster Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2268-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen D. Persell, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Elisha M. Friesema, Andrew J. Cooper, David W. Baker |
| Abstract |
Many individuals at higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) do not receive recommended treatments. Prior interventions using personalized risk information to promote prevention did not test clinic-wide effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,468,080
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,009
of 7,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,078
of 184,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.