You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide associations for birth weight and correlations with adult disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Momoko Horikoshi, Robin N. Beaumont, Felix R. Day, Nicole M. Warrington, Marjolein N. Kooijman, Juan Fernandez-Tajes, Bjarke Feenstra, Natalie R. van Zuydam, Kyle J. Gaulton, Niels Grarup, Jonathan P. Bradfield, David P. Strachan, Ruifang Li-Gao, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Eskil Kreiner, Rico Rueedi, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Diana L. Cousminer, Ying Wu, Elisabeth Thiering, Carol A. Wang, Christian T. Have, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Natalia Vilor-Tejedor, Peter K. Joshi, Eileen Tai Hui Boh, Ioanna Ntalla, Niina Pitkänen, Anubha Mahajan, Elisabeth M. van Leeuwen, Raimo Joro, Vasiliki Lagou, Michael Nodzenski, Louise A. Diver, Krina T. Zondervan, Mariona Bustamante, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Josep M. Mercader, Amanda J. Bennett, Nilufer Rahmioglu, Dale R. Nyholt, Ronald C. W. Ma, Claudia H. T. Tam, Wing Hung Tam, Santhi K. Ganesh, Frank J. A. van Rooij, Samuel E. Jones, Po-Ru Loh, Katherine S. Ruth, Marcus A. Tuke, Jessica Tyrrell, Andrew R. Wood, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Denise M. Scholtens, Lavinia Paternoster, Inga Prokopenko, Peter Kovacs, Mustafa Atalay, Sara M. Willems, Kalliope Panoutsopoulou, Xu Wang, Lisbeth Carstensen, Frank Geller, Katharina E. Schraut, Mario Murcia, Catharina E. M. van Beijsterveldt, Gonneke Willemsen, Emil V. R. Appel, Cilius E. Fonvig, Caecilie Trier, Carla M. T. Tiesler, Marie Standl, Zoltán Kutalik, Sílvia Bonàs-Guarch, David M. Hougaard, Friman Sánchez, David Torrents, Johannes Waage, Mads V. Hollegaard, Hugoline G. de Haan, Frits R. Rosendaal, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Susan M. Ring, Gibran Hemani, George McMahon, Neil R. Robertson, Christopher J. Groves, Claudia Langenberg, Jian’an Luan, Robert A. Scott, Jing Hua Zhao, Frank D. Mentch, Scott M. MacKenzie, Rebecca M. Reynolds, William L. Lowe, Anke Tönjes, Michael Stumvoll, Virpi Lindi, Timo A. Lakka, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Wieland Kiess, Antje Körner, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Harri Niinikoski, Katja Pahkala, Olli T. Raitakari, Eleftheria Zeggini, George V. Dedoussis, Yik-Ying Teo, Seang-Mei Saw, Mads Melbye, Harry Campbell, James F. Wilson, Martine Vrijheid, Eco J. C. N. de Geus, Dorret I. Boomsma, Haja N. Kadarmideen, Jens-Christian Holm, Torben Hansen, Sylvain Sebert, Andrew T. Hattersley, Lawrence J. Beilin, John P. Newnham, Craig E. Pennell, Joachim Heinrich, Linda S. Adair, Judith B. Borja, Karen L. Mohlke, Johan G. Eriksson, Elisabeth Widén, Mika Kähönen, Jorma S. Viikari, Terho Lehtimäki, Peter Vollenweider, Klaus Bønnelykke, Hans Bisgaard, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Albert Hofman, Fernando Rivadeneira, André G. Uitterlinden, Charlotta Pisinger, Oluf Pedersen, Christine Power, Elina Hyppönen, Nicholas J. Wareham, Hakon Hakonarson, Eleanor Davies, Brian R. Walker, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Struan F. A. Grant, Allan A. Vaag, Debbie A. Lawlor, Timothy M. Frayling, George Davey Smith, Andrew P. Morris, Ken K. Ong, Janine F. Felix, Nicholas J. Timpson, John R. B. Perry, David M. Evans, Mark I. McCarthy, Rachel M. Freathy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 317 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 58 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 41 | 13% |
| Australia | 11 | 3% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 20% |
| Unknown | 98 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 190 | 60% |
| Scientists | 96 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 598 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 120 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 118 | 19% |
| Unknown | 129 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 96 | 16% |
| Unknown | 165 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 332. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#101,589
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,982
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,100
of 331,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#154
of 1,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.