You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of an integrated hatchery program: can genetic-based performance differences between hatchery and wild Chinook salmon be avoided?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1139/cjfas-2012-0138 |
| Authors |
Michael C. Hayes, Reginald R. Reisenbichler, Stephen P. Rubin, Deanne C. Drake, Karl D. Stenberg, Sewall F. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
#3,343
of 3,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,378
of 285,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
#18
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.