| Title |
The relation of low glycaemic index fruit consumption to glycaemic control and risk factors for coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-010-1927-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. J. A. Jenkins, K. Srichaikul, C. W. C. Kendall, J. L. Sievenpiper, S. Abdulnour, A. Mirrahimi, C. Meneses, S. Nishi, X. He, S. Lee, Y. T. So, A. Esfahani, S. Mitchell, T. L. Parker, E. Vidgen, R. G. Josse, L. A. Leiter |
| Abstract |
Sugar has been suggested to promote obesity, diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD), yet fruit, despite containing sugars, may also have a low glycaemic index (GI) and all fruits are generally recommended for good health. We therefore assessed the effect of fruit with special emphasis on low GI fruit intake in type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Turkey | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#701,601
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#386
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,033
of 99,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.