↓ Skip to main content

A double‐observer method for reducing bias in faecal pellet surveys of forest ungulates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A double‐observer method for reducing bias in faecal pellet surveys of forest ungulates
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01512.x
Authors

K. J. Jenkins, B. F. J. Manly

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 155 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 26%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 49%
Environmental Science 35 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,466,862
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,444
of 3,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,600
of 91,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.