| Title |
Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-9-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris J Brien, Bettina Berger, Huwaida Rabie, Mark Tester |
| Abstract |
There are a number of unresolved issues in the design of experiments in greenhouses. They include whether statistical designs should be used and, if so, which designs should be used. Also, are there thigmomorphogenic or other effects arising from the movement of plants on conveyor belts within a greenhouse? A two-phase, single-line wheat experiment involving four tactics was conducted in a conventional greenhouse and a fully-automated phenotyping greenhouse (Smarthouse) to investigate these issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,474,955
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#564
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,037
of 292,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.