You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Getting Ready for the Human Phenome Project: The 2012 Forum of the Human Variome Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Mutation, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/humu.22293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William S. Oetting, Peter N. Robinson, Marc S. Greenblatt, Richard G. Cotton, Tim Beck, John C. Carey, Sandra C. Doelken, Marta Girdea, Tudor Groza, Carol M. Hamilton, Ada Hamosh, Berit Kerner, Jacqueline A. L. MacArthur, Donna R. Maglott, Barend Mons, Heidi L. Rehm, Paul N. Schofield, Beverly A. Searle, Damian Smedley, Cynthia L. Smith, Inge Thomsen Bernstein, Andreas Zankl, Eric Y. Zhao |
| Abstract |
A forum of the Human Variome Project (HVP) was held as a satellite to the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics in San Francisco, California. The theme of this meeting was "Getting Ready for the Human Phenome Project." Understanding the genetic contribution to both rare single-gene "Mendelian" disorders and more complex common diseases will require integration of research efforts among many fields and better defined phenotypes. The HVP is dedicated to bringing together researchers and research populations throughout the world to provide the resources to investigate the impact of genetic variation on disease. To this end, there needs to be a greater sharing of phenotype and genotype data. For this to occur, many databases that currently exist will need to become interoperable to allow for the combining of cohorts with similar phenotypes to increase statistical power for studies attempting to identify novel disease genes or causative genetic variants. Improved systems and tools that enhance the collection of phenotype data from clinicians are urgently needed. This meeting begins the HVP's effort toward this important goal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 51% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#2,198
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,045
of 210,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#26
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.