You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequent Cross-Species Transmission of Parvoviruses among Diverse Carnivore Hosts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jvi.02428-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew B. Allison, Dennis J. Kohler, Karen A. Fox, Justin D. Brown, Richard W. Gerhold, Valerie I. Shearn-Bochsler, Edward J. Dubovi, Colin R. Parrish, Edward C. Holmes |
| Abstract |
Although parvoviruses are commonly described in domestic carnivores, little is known about their biodiversity in nondomestic species. A phylogenetic analysis of VP2 gene sequences from puma, coyote, gray wolf, bobcat, raccoon, and striped skunk revealed two major groups related to either feline panleukopenia virus ("FPV-like") or canine parvovirus ("CPV-like"). Cross-species transmission was commonplace, with multiple introductions into each host species but, with the exception of raccoons, relatively little evidence for onward transmission in nondomestic species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 36 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,113,257
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#1,061
of 25,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,638
of 288,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#7
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.