↓ Skip to main content

An Investigation of Complex Attachment- and Trauma-Related Symptomatology Among Children in Foster and Kinship Care

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
An Investigation of Complex Attachment- and Trauma-Related Symptomatology Among Children in Foster and Kinship Care
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10578-013-0366-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Tarren-Sweeney

Abstract

The paper reports an investigation into the nature, patterns and complexity of mental health symptomatology reported for a large (N = 347) population sample of children in foster and kinship care. Cluster analyses were performed on caregiver-reported Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Assessment Checklist for Children (ACC) scores. The derived profile types are characterized more by symptom complexity than specificity, and are delineated more by elevation than shape. The analyses indicate that social and interpersonal relationship difficulties are hallmark features of clinical presentations of children in care; that anxiety is more often observed as a component of felt insecurity than as generalized or trauma-specific anxiety; and that attention-deficit hyperactivity is rarely manifested in isolation from other difficulties. Whereas 35 % of children had clinical difficulties that could plausibly be construed as discrete mental disorders or comorbidity, another 20 % displayed complex attachment- and trauma-related symptomatology that is not adequately conceptualized within DSM or ICD classifications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 48%
Social Sciences 31 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,745,370
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#537
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,024
of 282,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.