↓ Skip to main content

Variations in acute stroke care and the impact of organised care on survival from a European perspective: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variations in acute stroke care and the impact of organised care on survival from a European perspective: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, February 2013
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salma Ahmed Ayis, Bolaji Coker, Ajay Bhalla, Ian Wellwood, Anthony G Rudd, Antonio Di Carlo, Yannick Bejot, Danuta Ryglewicz, Daiva Rastenyte, Peter Langhorne, Martin S Dennis, Christopher McKevitt, Charles D A Wolfe

Abstract

The need for stroke care is escalating with an ageing population, yet methods to estimate the delivery of effective care across countries are not standardised or robust. Associations between quality and intensity of care and stroke outcomes are often assumed but have not been clearly demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 44%
Psychology 6 12%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,254,590
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#2,159
of 7,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,037
of 291,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#19
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.