↓ Skip to main content

Admixture in Latin America

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Admixture in Latin America
Published in
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gde.2016.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaustubh Adhikari, Javier Mendoza-Revilla, Juan Camilo Chacón-Duque, Macarena Fuentes-Guajardo, Andrés Ruiz-Linares

Abstract

Latin Americans arguably represent the largest recently admixed populations in the world. This reflects a history of massive settlement by immigrants (mostly Europeans and Africans) and their variable admixture with Natives, starting in 1492. This process resulted in the population of Latin America showing an extensive genetic and phenotypic diversity. Here we review how genetic analyses are being applied to examine the demographic history of this population, including patterns of mating, population structure and ancestry. The admixture history of Latin America, and the resulting extensive diversity of the region, represents a natural experiment offering an advantageous setting for genetic association studies. We review how recent analyses in Latin Americans are contributing to elucidating the genetic architecture of human complex traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 16 12%
Professor 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,443,738
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
#649
of 1,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,573
of 330,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.