↓ Skip to main content

Causal and Constitutive Relations, and the Squaring of Coleman’s Diagram: Reply to Vromen

Overview of attention for article published in Erkenntnis, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Causal and Constitutive Relations, and the Squaring of Coleman’s Diagram: Reply to Vromen
Published in
Erkenntnis, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10670-010-9238-y
Authors

Peter Abell, Teppo Felin, Nicolai Foss

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 55%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Philosophy 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2010.
All research outputs
#3,289,744
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Erkenntnis
#51
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,421
of 99,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Erkenntnis
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.