↓ Skip to main content

Fas expression by tumor stroma is required for cancer eradication

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fas expression by tumor stroma is required for cancer eradication
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1218295110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna J. Listopad, Thomas Kammertoens, Kathleen Anders, Bjoern Silkenstedt, Gerald Willimsky, Karin Schmidt, Anja A. Kuehl, Christoph Loddenkemper, Thomas Blankenstein

Abstract

The contribution of molecules such as perforin, IFN-γ (IFNγ), and particularly Fas ligand (FasL) by transferred CD8(+) effector T (T(E)) cells to rejection of large, established tumors is incompletely understood. Efficient attack against large tumors carrying a surrogate tumor antigen (mimicking a "passenger" mutation) by T(E) cells requires action of IFNγ on tumor stroma cells to avoid selection of antigen-loss variants. Because "cancer-driving" antigens (CDAs) are rarely counterselected, IFNγ may be expected to be dispensable in elimination of cancers by targeting a CDA. Here, initial regression of large, established tumors required neither IFNγ, FasL, nor perforin by transferred CD8(+) T(E) cells targeting Simian Virus (SV) 40 large T as CDA. However, cytotoxic T(E) cells lacking IFNγ or FasL could not prevent relapse despite retention of the rejection antigen by the cancer cells. Complete tumor rejection required IFNγ-regulated Fas by the tumor stroma. Therefore, T(E) cells lacking IFNγ or FasL cannot prevent progression of antigenic cancer because the tumor stroma escapes destruction if its Fas expression is down-regulated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 13%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,741,542
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#91,769
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,250
of 288,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#837
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.