↓ Skip to main content

Predicting rehospitalization and outpatient services from administration and clinical databases

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 527)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Predicting rehospitalization and outpatient services from administration and clinical databases
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/bf02287322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Hendryx, Joan E. Russo, Bruce Stegner, Dennis G. Dyck, Richard K. Ries, Peter RoyByrne

Abstract

The study tests whether psychiatric services utilization may be predicted from administrative databases without clinical variables equally as well as from databases with clinical variables. Persons with a psychiatric hospitalization at an urban medical center were followed for 1 year postdischarge (N = 1384.) Dependent variables included statewide rehospitalization and the number of hours of outpatient services received. Three linear and logistic regression models were developed and cross-validated: a basic model with limited administrative independent variables, an intermediate model with diagnostic and limited clinical indicators, and a full model containing additional clinical predictors. For rehospitalization, the clinical cross-validated model accounted for twice the variance accounted by the basic model (adjusted R2 = .13 and .06, respectively). For outpatient hours, the basic cross-validated model performed as well as the clinical model (adjusted R2 = .36 and .34, respectively). Clinical indicators such as assessment of functioning and co-occurring substance use disorder should be considered for inclusion in predicting rehospitalization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
Netherlands 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Psychology 11 20%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Computer Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,258,790
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#19
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,238
of 52,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them