↓ Skip to main content

Comments on Harn–Lin’s cheating detection scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Designs, Codes and Cryptography, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Comments on Harn–Lin’s cheating detection scheme
Published in
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10623-010-9416-6
Authors

Hossein Ghodosi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 50%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2011.
All research outputs
#13,630,070
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#131
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,245
of 96,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them