↓ Skip to main content

Effects of subliminal hints on insight problem solving

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Effects of subliminal hints on insight problem solving
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0389-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masasi Hattori, Steven A. Sloman, Ryo Orita

Abstract

Two experiments tested a total of 509 participants on insight problems (the radiation problem and the nine-dot problem). Half of the participants were first exposed to a 1-min movie that included a subliminal hint. The hint raised the solution rate of people who did not recognize it. In addition, the way they solved the problem was affected by the hint. In Experiment 3, a novel technique was introduced to address some methodological concerns raised by Experiments 1 and 2. A total of 80 participants solved the 10-coin problem, and half of them were exposed to a subliminal hint. The hint facilitated solving the problem, and it shortened the solution time. Some implications of subliminal priming for research on and theorizing about insight problem solving are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Russia 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 17 22%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 68%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 6 8%