| Title |
Kinematic shoulder MRI: the diagnostic value in acute shoulder dislocations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-012-2655-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marshall Marcus, Amit Malhotra, Moshe Peri, Mark Schweitzer, Ougortsin Vladislav, Shay Tenebaum, Nogah Shabshin |
| Abstract |
To determine whether positioning of the arm in adduction and internal rotation would improve the confidence in the diagnosis of Bankart lesions in first time shoulder dislocators. Eleven patients were imaged on an open bore MRI within 1-6 days of traumatic shoulder dislocation with the arm adducted and internally rotated, and subsequently the patients were reimaged with the arm adduced and externally rotated. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists determined the confidence of diagnosing labral tears in each of the two positions. An anterior-inferior labral tear was diagnosed in 11/11 patients in internal rotation and in 6/11 patients in external rotation. The average confidence was 2.8 in internal rotation and 1.5 in external rotation (on a scale of 0-3). Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, the certainty of the diagnosis was determined to be significantly higher with the arm in internal rotation (P = 0.016). MRI performed with the arm in internal rotation for patients with acute first time anterior shoulder dislocation increases the certainty of the diagnosis of anterior-inferior labral tears. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,907
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,801
of 170,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.