↓ Skip to main content

An empirical EEG analysis in brain death diagnosis for adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 326)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
An empirical EEG analysis in brain death diagnosis for adults
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11571-008-9047-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhe Chen, Jianting Cao, Yang Cao, Yue Zhang, Fanji Gu, Guoxian Zhu, Zhen Hong, Bin Wang, Andrzej Cichocki

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) is often used in the confirmatory test for brain death diagnosis in clinical practice. Because EEG recording and monitoring is relatively safe for the patients in deep coma, it is believed to be valuable for either reducing the risk of brain death diagnosis (while comparing other tests such as the apnea) or preventing mistaken diagnosis. The objective of this paper is to study several statistical methods for quantitative EEG analysis in order to help bedside or ambulatory monitoring or diagnosis. We apply signal processing and quantitative statistical analysis for the EEG recordings of 32 adult patients. For EEG signal processing, independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to separate the independent source components, followed by Fourier and time-frequency analysis. For quantitative EEG analysis, we apply several statistical complexity measures to the EEG signals and evaluate the differences between two groups of patients: the subjects in deep coma, and the subjects who were categorized as brain death. We report statistically significant differences of quantitative statistics with real-life EEG recordings in such a clinical study, and we also present interpretation and discussions on the preliminary experimental results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Engineering 16 21%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Computer Science 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#145,203
of 23,720,526 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#1
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219
of 82,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,720,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them