| Title |
Enabling the recycling of rare earth elements through product design and trend analyses of hard disk drives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10163-014-0347-6 |
| Authors |
Maximilian Ueberschaar, Vera Susanne Rotter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,611,092
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#48
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,870
of 357,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them