↓ Skip to main content

Combined Analysis of Phase III Trials Evaluating [99mTc]Tilmanocept and Vital Blue Dye for Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Clinically Node-Negative Cutaneous Melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Combined Analysis of Phase III Trials Evaluating [99mTc]Tilmanocept and Vital Blue Dye for Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Clinically Node-Negative Cutaneous Melanoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2012
DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2612-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vernon K. Sondak, Dennis W. King, Jonathan S. Zager, Schlomo Schneebaum, Julian Kim, Stanley P. L. Leong, Mark B. Faries, Bruce J. Averbook, Steve R. Martinez, Christopher A. Puleo, Jane L. Messina, Lori Christman, Anne M. Wallace

Abstract

[(99m)Tc]Tilmanocept is a CD206 receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical designed for sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification. Two nearly identical nonrandomized phase III trials compared [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept to vital blue dye.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Other 12 20%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Chemistry 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,062,899
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#470
of 6,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,497
of 172,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.