You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insect Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4419-6445-8 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4419-6444-1, 978-1-4419-6445-8
|
| Authors |
Thany, Steeve Herve |
| Editors |
Steeve Hervé Thany PhD |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,073,503
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#480
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,987
of 167,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#7
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.