↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Scales of Environmental Effects from Gasoline and Ethanol Production

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Scales of Environmental Effects from Gasoline and Ethanol Production
Published in
Environmental Management, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9983-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther S. Parish, Keith L. Kline, Virginia H. Dale, Rebecca A. Efroymson, Allen C. McBride, Timothy L. Johnson, Michael R. Hilliard, Jeffrey M. Bielicki

Abstract

Understanding the environmental effects of alternative fuel production is critical to characterizing the sustainability of energy resources to inform policy and regulatory decisions. The magnitudes of these environmental effects vary according to the intensity and scale of fuel production along each step of the supply chain. We compare the spatial extent and temporal duration of ethanol and gasoline production processes and environmental effects based on a literature review and then synthesize the scale differences on space-time diagrams. Comprehensive assessment of any fuel-production system is a moving target, and our analysis shows that decisions regarding the selection of spatial and temporal boundaries of analysis have tremendous influences on the comparisons. Effects that strongly differentiate gasoline and ethanol-supply chains in terms of scale are associated with when and where energy resources are formed and how they are extracted. Although both gasoline and ethanol production may result in negative environmental effects, this study indicates that ethanol production traced through a supply chain may impact less area and result in more easily reversed effects of a shorter duration than gasoline production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Engineering 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,348
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,219
of 285,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.