Title |
Psychological risk factors of micro- and macrovascular outcomes in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: rationale and design of the DiaDDZoB Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-388 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giesje Nefs, François Pouwer, Johan Denollet, Victor JM Pop |
Abstract |
Depression is a common psychiatric complication of diabetes, but little is known about the natural course and the consequences of depressive symptoms in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. While depression has been related to poor glycemic control and increased risk for macrovascular disease, its association with microvascular complications remains understudied. The predictive role of other psychological risk factors such as Type D (distressed) personality and the mechanisms that possibly link depression and Type D personality with poor vascular outcomes are also still unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Morocco | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 22 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,263,666
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,268
of 14,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,593
of 93,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#58
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.