↓ Skip to main content

Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
138 X users
patent
19 patents
facebook
30 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
768 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
852 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2013
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.121189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan B Azad, Theodore Konya, Heather Maughan, David S Guttman, Catherine J Field, Radha S Chari, Malcolm R Sears, Allan B Becker, James A Scott, Anita L Kozyrskyj

Abstract

The gut microbiota is essential to human health throughout life, yet the acquisition and development of this microbial community during infancy remains poorly understood. Meanwhile, there is increasing concern over rising rates of cesarean delivery and insufficient exclusive breastfeeding of infants in developed countries. In this article, we characterize the gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants and describe the influence of cesarean delivery and formula feeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 852 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 833 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 15%
Researcher 118 14%
Student > Master 115 13%
Student > Bachelor 98 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 139 16%
Unknown 211 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 75 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 5%
Other 97 11%
Unknown 233 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 319. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#107,772
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#199
of 9,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#650
of 298,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.