↓ Skip to main content

Integrative Genomic Analyses Reveal an Androgen-Driven Somatic Alteration Landscape in Early-Onset Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrative Genomic Analyses Reveal an Androgen-Driven Somatic Alteration Landscape in Early-Onset Prostate Cancer
Published in
Cancer Cell, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joachim Weischenfeldt, Ronald Simon, Lars Feuerbach, Karin Schlangen, Dieter Weichenhan, Sarah Minner, Daniela Wuttig, Hans-Jörg Warnatz, Henning Stehr, Tobias Rausch, Natalie Jäger, Lei Gu, Olga Bogatyrova, Adrian M. Stütz, Rainer Claus, Jürgen Eils, Roland Eils, Clarissa Gerhäuser, Po-Hsien Huang, Barbara Hutter, Rolf Kabbe, Christian Lawerenz, Sylwester Radomski, Cynthia C. Bartholomae, Maria Fälth, Stephan Gade, Manfred Schmidt, Nina Amschler, Thomas Haß, Rami Galal, Jovisa Gjoni, Ruprecht Kuner, Constance Baer, Sawinee Masser, Christof von Kalle, Thomas Zichner, Vladimir Benes, Benjamin Raeder, Malte Mader, Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy, Meryem Avci, Hans Lehrach, Dmitri Parkhomchuk, Marc Sultan, Lia Burkhardt, Markus Graefen, Hartwig Huland, Martina Kluth, Antje Krohn, Hüseyin Sirma, Laura Stumm, Stefan Steurer, Katharina Grupp, Holger Sültmann, Guido Sauter, Christoph Plass, Benedikt Brors, Marie-Laure Yaspo, Jan O. Korbel, Thorsten Schlomm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 4 1%
Denmark 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 251 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 20%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 37 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 18%
Computer Science 5 2%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,138,341
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#876
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,701
of 297,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.