↓ Skip to main content

The 3rd DBCLS BioHackathon: improving life science data integration with Semantic Web technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The 3rd DBCLS BioHackathon: improving life science data integration with Semantic Web technologies
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2041-1480-4-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BioHackathon 2010 was the third in a series of meetings hosted by the Database Center for Life Sciences (DBCLS) in Tokyo, Japan. The overall goal of the BioHackathon series is to improve the quality and accessibility of life science research data on the Web by bringing together representatives from public databases, analytical tool providers, and cyber-infrastructure researchers to jointly tackle important challenges in the area of in silico biological research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Japan 4 4%
Netherlands 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 79 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Engineering 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,108,327
of 27,907,545 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#53
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,012
of 306,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,907,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.