↓ Skip to main content

De novo missense variants in PPP1CB are associated with intellectual disability and congenital heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
De novo missense variants in PPP1CB are associated with intellectual disability and congenital heart disease
Published in
Human Genetics, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00439-016-1731-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lijiang Ma, Yavuz Bayram, Heather M. McLaughlin, Megan T. Cho, Alyson Krokosky, Clesson E. Turner, Kristin Lindstrom, Caleb P. Bupp, Katey Mayberry, Weiyi Mu, Joann Bodurtha, Veronique Weinstein, Neda Zadeh, Wendy Alcaraz, Zöe Powis, Yunru Shao, Daryl A. Scott, Andrea M. Lewis, Janson J. White, Shalani N. Jhangiani, Elif Yilmaz Gulec, Seema R. Lalani, James R. Lupski, Kyle Retterer, Rhonda E. Schnur, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Sherri Bale, Wendy K. Chung

Abstract

Intellectual disabilities are genetically heterogeneous and can be associated with congenital anomalies. Using whole-exome sequencing (WES), we identified five different de novo missense variants in the protein phosphatase-1 catalytic subunit beta (PPP1CB) gene in eight unrelated individuals who share an overlapping phenotype of dysmorphic features, macrocephaly, developmental delay or intellectual disability (ID), congenital heart disease, short stature, and skeletal and connective tissue abnormalities. Protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) is a serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase involved in the dephosphorylation of a variety of proteins. The PPP1CB gene encodes a PP1 subunit that regulates the level of protein phosphorylation. All five altered amino acids we observed are highly conserved among the PP1 subunit family, and all are predicted to disrupt PP1 subunit binding and impair dephosphorylation. Our data suggest that our heterozygous de novo PPP1CB pathogenic variants are associated with syndromic intellectual disability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Computer Science 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,862,678
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,495
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,610
of 322,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.