↓ Skip to main content

The Promotion of Self-Regulation Through Parenting Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Promotion of Self-Regulation Through Parenting Interventions
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10567-013-0129-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew R. Sanders, Trevor G. Mazzucchelli

Abstract

The capacity for a parent to self-regulate their own performance is argued to be a fundamental process underpinning the maintenance of positive, nurturing, non-abusive parenting practices that promote good developmental and health outcomes in children. Deficits in self-regulatory capacity, which have their origins in early childhood, are common in many psychological disorders, and strengthening self-regulation skills is widely recognised as an important goal in many psychological therapies and is a fundamental goal in preventive interventions. Attainment of enhanced self-regulation skills enables individuals to gain a greater sense of personal control and mastery over their life. This paper illustrates how the self-regulatory principles can be applied to parenting and family-based interventions at the level of the child, parent, practitioner and organisation. The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, which uses a self-regulatory model of intervention, is used as an example to illustrate the robustness and versatility of the self-regulation approach to all phases of the parent consultation process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 312 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 168 53%
Social Sciences 45 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 68 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,915,144
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#180
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,690
of 291,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.