| Title |
The Registry of Knowledge Translation Methods and Tools: a resource to support evidence-informed public health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-013-0448-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslea Peirson, Cristina Catallo, Sunita Chera |
| Abstract |
This paper examines the development of a globally accessible online Registry of Knowledge Translation Methods and Tools to support evidence-informed public health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| Canada | 3 | 23% |
| Senegal | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Librarian | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,354,203
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#512
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,391
of 292,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.